Rumor: World At War Perks List - Page 2 - Xbox360Evolved

ssp0929 · 08-25-2008, 08:48 PM

Yeah. But Juggernaut is not useful for close-quarter or even medium-ranged combat. Only if you're playing against inaccurate players.

xSTEVEO · 08-25-2008, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IC3MAN

It's not really a 4 hit kill no matter what. I've shot a people and right as I'm about to kill them i see that stupid ass red plus sign pop up and then i get shot from somewhere else. If they didn't have that juggernaut on, they would have been dead, but with having it gives them that one second extra life they need to survive. And it's going to be even dumber with tanks, you're about to kill it and then right as you're about to hit it with your last rocket or something, you're going to get shot from somewhere else. That equals dumb.

tanks get taken out really easily though and if juggernaut is on itll be a little more difficult.

but taking tanks out in cod3 and battlefield is nothing like crysis. it takes like 10 rockets it seems. and plus the fukers in the tank always retreat and heal t their tank in a second.

which is probably what will happen in cod5 but since it says limited extent it sounds alot better.

ssp0929 · 08-26-2008, 05:09 PM

Tanks are ****ing worthless. If there is a lot of cover, its impossible to kill anyone.

xSTEVEO · 08-27-2008, 05:49 PM

vehicles are my favorite part about the treyarch cod's. i love vehicular combat.

the game im really looking foward to is the first game that uses ace combat 6 sized maps and controls, integrated with cod4 sytled gameplay with vehicles, and battlestations midway into one enourmous land-air-sea type combat with 500 people online. id probably play that game all the time.

ssp0929 · 08-27-2008, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xSTEVEO

vehicles are my favorite part about the treyarch cod's. i love vehicular combat.

the game im really looking foward to is the first game that uses ace combat 6 sized maps and controls, integrated with cod4 sytled gameplay with vehicles, and battlestations midway into one enourmous land-air-sea type combat with 500 people online. id probably play that game all the time.

MAG is probably the closest we'll get to that type of game in the near future.

Until they like invent something 10x faster than cable, and like 16x CPU. Rather than double-quad core. Or w/e they have now.

loyaltrekie · 08-28-2008, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IC3MAN

It's not really a 4 hit kill no matter what. I've shot a people and right as I'm about to kill them i see that stupid ass red plus sign pop up and then i get shot from somewhere else. If they didn't have that juggernaut on, they would have been dead, but with having it gives them that one second extra life they need to survive. And it's going to be even dumber with tanks, you're about to kill it and then right as you're about to hit it with your last rocket or something, you're going to get shot from somewhere else. That equals dumb.

Stopping power cancels out juggernaut, what perk 2 are you using in normal that isnt SP -_-

IC3MAN · 08-28-2008, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loyaltrekie

Stopping power cancels out juggernaut, what perk 2 are you using in normal that isnt SP -_-

That's the point, i don't want to use Stopping power. I'd rather have a different perk on then that, but people using Juggernaut forces me to change it to something i don't want to use.

ssp0929 · 08-28-2008, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loyaltrekie

Stopping power cancels out juggernaut, what perk 2 are you using in normal that isnt SP -_-

Why can't you agree? Juggernaut is cheap as hell. And its still a waste of a slot space. Where you could use something better.

xSTEVEO · 08-28-2008, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssp0929

MAG is probably the closest we'll get to that type of game in the near future.

Until they like invent something 10x faster than cable, and like 16x CPU. Rather than double-quad core. Or w/e they have now.

alot of this is already avaliable or under research an development, as well as nano technology. but idk if that would be more expensive to manufacture. theres also a source of free energy technology at area 51. but is confidential and wont be released publicly for a while.

no but it doesnt take a monster pc or console to run a game like i said. using more advanced methods is all it takes. its probably just too much work for developers.

OldSnakeWontDie · 08-28-2008, 07:38 PM

Did you see? Michael Phelps got World At War already. ahhhhhhhh that *******.

IC3MAN · 08-28-2008, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSnakeWontDie

Did you see? Michael Phelps got World At War already. ahhhhhhhh that *******.

I thought you were lying at first so i had to look it up. Looks like you weren't.

Watch CBS Videos Online

ssp0929 · 08-28-2008, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xSTEVEO

alot of this is already avaliable or under research an development, as well as nano technology. but idk if that would be more expensive to manufacture. theres also a source of free energy technology at area 51. but is confidential and wont be released publicly for a while.

no but it doesnt take a monster pc or console to run a game like i said. using more advanced methods is all it takes. its probably just too much work for developers.

Too expensive too. Things get cheaper over time. Hopefully nano-tech and more advanced tech like that get cheap fast.

IC3MAN · 08-28-2008, 10:31 PM

I also realized that this game comes out 4 days after Gears of War 2. This game can definitely wait a little bit on my list. No doubt GoW 2 will be taking up all my time on my 360.

ssp0929 · 08-29-2008, 04:15 PM

^ My parents dislike games that overexaggerate the amount of blood and gore.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)